How do rookie officers compare to those with 5+ years of service regarding misconduct leading to decertification?

The correct answer is that rookie officers are less often involved in misconduct that leads to decertification compared to those with five or more years of service. This phenomenon may be attributed to several factors. New recruits typically undergo extensive training, which emphasizes professionalism, ethical behavior, and adherence to policies. Moreover, rookie officers are often acutely aware of the scrutiny on their early performance and the potential consequences of misconduct, leading them to be more cautious in their actions.

In contrast, officers with five or more years of experience may have developed habits and a comfort level that can sometimes lead to complacency regarding adherence to policies and ethical standards. Over time, the pressures and challenges of the job may also contribute to greater exposure to situations where misconduct can arise. Furthermore, accumulating experiences can either positively or negatively influence their decision-making, and unfortunately, this may sometimes lead to actions that result in decertification.

Overall, rookies are generally seen as being more cautious and focused on their training, which tends to protect them from involvement in serious misconduct compared to their more experienced counterparts.