What is the procedural requirement called that states evidence obtained by violating a person's Constitutional rights is not admissible in court?

The procedural requirement that evidence obtained in violation of an individual's Constitutional rights is not admissible in court is known as the Exclusionary Rule. This principle serves to protect the rights of individuals by ensuring that law enforcement cannot use evidence that has been acquired through illegal means, such as unlawful searches and seizures, or through coercion during interrogation.

The Exclusionary Rule is rooted in the Fourth Amendment, which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, as well as in the principles enshrined in the Fifth Amendment concerning self-incrimination. Its primary aim is to deter law enforcement from engaging in misconduct, thereby upholding the integrity of the judicial process. Courts apply this rule to maintain fairness and protect citizens' rights, ensuring that evidence that could undermine the legal system's credibility is excluded from judicial proceedings.

Understanding the importance of the Exclusionary Rule is key for those in the criminal justice field, as it underscores the need for law enforcement to operate within the bounds of the law to secure evidence that is both legal and admissible in court.