What term best describes mutual agreement between two parties to engage in physical confrontation?

The term "mutual combat" accurately describes the situation where two parties agree to engage in a physical confrontation. This concept is based on the understanding that both individuals willingly participate in the fight, acknowledging the risks involved. In legal contexts, mutual combat can imply that both participants consented to the altercation, which can impact the potential legal ramifications for both parties involved.

In contrast, "mutual abuse" does not specifically refer to an agreed-upon confrontation, but rather suggests a pattern of reciprocal violence, which may not involve consensual participation. The phrases "need for arrest" and "need for dual arrests" pertain to decisions made by law enforcement in response to an incident but do not define the nature of the agreement between two parties to fight. Hence, mutual combat is the correct term reflecting the voluntary nature of both parties choosing to engage in the physical confrontation.