Which legal case addressed the issue of police interrogation methods and rights to counsel?

The case that specifically addressed the issue of police interrogation methods and the rights to counsel is Miranda v. Arizona. This landmark decision established the requirement for law enforcement to inform individuals of their rights during the interrogation process, specifically the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.

Prior to this ruling, many suspects were not fully aware of their rights, which often led to coercive interrogations and involuntary confessions. The Supreme Court's decision emphasized the necessity of protecting a suspect's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The outcome reinforced the protocol known as "Miranda warnings," which must be administered to individuals taken into custody before questioning to ensure they understand and can exercise their rights.

The other cases listed pertain to different legal issues; Gideon v. Wainwright involves the right to counsel in criminal cases more broadly. Roe v. Wade addresses women's rights regarding abortion, while Kelo v. City of New London deals with the use of eminent domain. Each of these cases has had significant legal implications, but none focuses specifically on police interrogation methods and the rights of individuals during such processes like Miranda v. Arizona does.